Peer Review Policy

At NURSIJ (Nursing Science and Innovation Journal), we are committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity and excellence. Our peer review process is a cornerstone of our commitment to publishing rigorous and high-quality research.

Peer Review Process:

  1. Initial Submission Review:

    • Upon submission, manuscripts are initially assessed by the editorial team to ensure they meet the journal’s scope, format, and quality standards. Manuscripts that do not align with the journal’s focus or fail to meet basic submission criteria may be returned to authors without further review.

  2. Selection of Reviewers:

    • Manuscripts that pass the initial review are assigned to expert reviewers who have relevant knowledge and expertise in the subject area of the submission. Reviewers are selected based on their academic qualifications, research experience, and impartiality.

  3. Double-Blind Review:

    • NURSIJ employs a double-blind peer review process, where both the reviewers and the authors remain anonymous to each other. This approach is designed to minimize bias and ensure an objective evaluation of the manuscript.

  4. Review Process:

    • Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on criteria such as originality, significance, methodological rigor, clarity, and relevance to the field of nursing. They provide detailed feedback and recommendations for improvement.

  5. Revisions and Resubmission:

    • Authors may be required to revise their manuscripts based on reviewer comments and suggestions. Revised manuscripts are often reassessed by the original reviewers to ensure that their concerns have been adequately addressed.

  6. Editorial Decision:

    • Following the review process, the editorial team makes a final decision on the manuscript based on the reviewers’ recommendations. Decisions may include acceptance, minor or major revisions, or rejection.

  7. Ethical Considerations:

    • NURSIJ upholds strict ethical standards in the peer review process. All reviewers are expected to disclose any conflicts of interest and adhere to confidentiality agreements. Any ethical concerns raised during the review are addressed promptly.

  8. Transparency and Integrity:

    • We strive for transparency in the review process and ensure that all decisions are based on the merit of the research. Authors and reviewers are encouraged to communicate openly with the editorial team to address any concerns or issues.

Reviewer Responsibilities:

  • Expert Evaluation: Provide a thorough and objective evaluation of the manuscript’s quality and significance.
  • Constructive Feedback: Offer constructive feedback and suggestions for improving the manuscript.
  • Timeliness: Complete reviews within the agreed timeframe to facilitate a timely publication process.

Author Responsibilities:

  • Originality: Ensure that the manuscript is original, properly cited, and free from plagiarism.
  • Revisions: Address reviewer comments and revise the manuscript accordingly.
  • Ethical Compliance: Adhere to ethical standards in research and publication.

Contact Information:

For any questions or further information regarding the peer review process, please contact us at editor@nursij.com